Technology portfolio · CVI

Missing peers are gaps, not facts.

CVI — Callosum Vector Integration is a relational-vector synchronisation and governed coordination fabric. It lets a system use semantic recall without letting similarity overrule what the system authoritatively knows. CVI is implemented and separately licensable; qualification remains incomplete.

Recall is advisory by constructionThe vector plane is derived, disposable, and never authoritative. That is enforced at runtime, not asserted in a design document.
Arbitration is the productEvery recall row is checked against authoritative memory and classified by whether authority backs it.
The client supplies contextMiraTV demonstrates an integration environment; claims still remain bounded to registered evidence.

The organizing idea

Separation of semantic recall and authority.

Most catalog and knowledge systems blur the two, and the blur is what makes AI-assisted work untrustworthy. CVI keeps them in physically separate stores and makes crossing between them a governed act.

Authoritative memory

The canonical plane

A relational source of truth owns identity, lifecycle state, and confidence. Promotion follows a controlled draft → approved → retired path. Deletion here is real deletion.

Semantic recall

The advisory plane

Vector embeddings are advisory, never authoritative. They are a one-way projection from canonical content, disposable by design, and rebuildable after a model upgrade without corrupting state.

Arbitration

The system reports where its own two halves disagree.

Separation is architecture — a competitor can copy the diagram. Arbitration is what the separation buys you, and it is the claim no similarity-first system can make.

Implemented · governed local-model lane

Vector facts are checked against authoritative memory before they are treated as evidence.

Every recall row is joined back to the canonical plane and classified by whether authority stands behind it. A recall hit with no authoritative peer is not demoted quietly or silently dropped — it is labelled a gap, and a gap is a reportable finding rather than a fact in waiting.

Matched peerMissing peer = gapAdvisory-only enforcementGrounded arbitration
What it catches

Blind spots

Strong semantic recall with no authoritative record behind it. The system says so instead of presenting the recall as knowledge.

What it catches

Convergence and duplication

Where the canonical plane holds two distinct records that recall keeps treating as one thing — the duplicate a normalizer missed.

What it enforces

Advisory-only, at runtime

The arbitration lane refuses to run unless the recall plane is marked advisory and the arbiter is in grounded mode. The discipline is a precondition, not a convention.

Technology components

What is actually owned.

Ingestion

Provider normalization

Structurally similar provider data can be normalized on entry while provider-native identifiers and provenance are preserved. Compatibility and scale remain subject to the actual adapter and qualification scope.

Identity

Canonical identity layer

Stable, platform-owned identifiers separate provider reference from platform authority. Cross-provider reconciliation is non-destructive and identity resolution is late-binding rather than forced at ingest.

Mapping

Concurrent ID mapping engine

An explicit mapping layer carries live, VOD, and series relationships, supporting overlapping provider IDs and multiple providers holding identical or near-identical content. Updates are non-destructive; retirement is soft, via active flags.

Projection

Relational–vector sync

A functional, model-versioned projection from canonical content into the recall plane. Re-embedding does not corrupt state, and the vector layer stays deliberately disposable.

Governance

Authority preservation

Explicit confidence scoring, controlled promotion lifecycle, traceable provenance, hydration from canonical records before reasoning, and deterministic authority lookup.

Policy

Controlled reasoning surface

Time-based validity windows, status-based filtering, and domain-level filtering — so what a model is permitted to see is a policy decision rather than an accident of schema.

Integration

Every plane is addressed by name, never by connection.

CVI is built to be adopted without demanding that a licensee replace their stack. The seam is a registry: callers ask for a logical plane, and a resolver decides what actually answers.

Registry-resolved

Logical planes, not connections

Authority, recall, knowledge, and coordination stores are each addressed by a registry key. Nothing in the calling code carries a connection, so repointing a plane is a configuration change rather than a code change.

Governed gateway

One audited path

Database access runs through a single governed gateway with token authentication, a permitted-statement boundary, and request logging — so access is observable and constrained rather than ambient.

Integration boundary

Bring your own model

Model choice can remain with the licensee. Relational, vector, and embedding-provider compatibility must be verified for the selected environment; broad embedding-provider independence is not presently claimed.

How it is evidenced

Implementation evidence is not universal qualification.

MiraTV provides a demanding reference context for CVI integration. Evidence from that environment can support bounded claims, but it does not establish suitability, scale, or qualification for every licensee environment.

Evidence in motion

A demanding, unforgiving workload

MiraTV is a live IPTV client and platform carrying real customer traffic across multiple providers on Android and Android TV. Catalog technology that degrades the viewing experience is technology nobody adopts — so the client working is not a demo, it is the argument.

What is on the table

CVI, proven by the client

What Iberion licenses is the architecture: normalization, canonical identity, concurrent mapping, the recall/authority separation, and the arbitration that governs it. It is portable to any catalog or knowledge problem of the same shape, and that portability is where its value sits.

The platform, client included, is available — that conversation can be had. But the client’s job here is to prove the technology does what this page says it does.

Shared reference context

One integration. Separate evidence boundaries.

The same client can carry CVI and Citadel in a latency-sensitive media workload. Each technology remains separately defined, licensed, evidenced, and qualified.

Also proven here

Citadel

Iberion’s protection architecture is integrated and exercised inside the same client, on Android and Android TV, with its evidence state published ring by ring rather than flattened into a single maturity claim.

Explore Citadel →
Ownership boundary

Demonstration is not definition

MiraTV is not Citadel, and it is not CVI either. It is a production application in which both have been integrated and exercised. Neither technology is defined, contained, or bounded by the application that happens to host it, and each is licensed on its own terms.

Technology portfolio →

Roadmap

Stated separately, because it is not shipped.

These are specified as optional advanced and premium capabilities. They are named so the roadmap is legible — not presented as current behaviour.

Planned

Catalog intelligence

Automated duplicate-resolution suggestions and semantic catalog gap analysis.

Planned

Comparative analytics

Provider performance scoring and cross-domain insight extraction.

Evidence boundary

How to read this page.

This page describes designed technology capability. Iberion assigns evidence status per capability rather than per product, and does not present a capability set as uniformly deployed, qualified, or independently certified simply because the architecture defines it.

Per-capability maturity — what is running in production, what is implemented and under qualification, and what remains specified — is available as a controlled record, under NDA and scoped to the specific question being asked.

The same discipline governs Iberion’s other technologies. See the Citadel press kit for a worked example of per-component evidence status stated publicly.